Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
Search results for: ram*ses in all categories
670 results found.
67 pages of results. 531. Chaos and Creation [Books] [de Grazia books]
... by the authoritatively accepted chronologists of Egypt, to mark a limit to the latest excavations of many sites of the Near East at about 1200, labelling them as destruction by "Peoples of the Sea." In 1977, Velikovsky published Peoples of the Sea. But here the iconoclast was undertaking one task and that alone- of showing that Ramses III, and certain successors were of the time of the Persian conquests, that is, of the fourth century B.C . instead of the conventionally dated thirteenth century. An absolute and authoritative chronology was off by 800 years! In 1977, Velikovsky published Ramses II, whereupon a large chunk of the pseudo-historical plastering covering the " ...
532. Plagues and Comets [Books] [de Grazia books]
... . 65 (1922). 11. Natural History, II, ch. XXII, 89-91. 12. Ex. 12:42b (Douay tr.) 13. Deut. 4:34-6. 14. 1 Kg 6:1 . 15. Ages in Chaos (1952); Peoples of the Sea (1977); Ramses II and His Time (1978); John J. Bimson, Reading the Exodus and Conquest, Sheffield, 1978; Donovan Courville, The Exodus Problem and Its Ramifications, Loma Linda: Calif., 1971, 2v. 16. N. -A. Boulanger, L'Antiquité Devoilée par ses Usages, 4 v., Amsterdam ...
533. The Foibles of Heretics [Books] [de Grazia books]
... Slabinski's calculations can't and don't take into account electro-magnetic effects. These are, after all, part and parcel of the Velikovskian view of celestial mechanics. So way do you take such great delight in Slabinski's calculations when they ignore them? Answer: jealousy. I have taken a lot of stick from KRONOS staff for the criticisms I made of Ramses II and His Time in my review. Letters from Greenberg, Rose, and others made an incredible fuss as if my criticisms had come out of the blue, and I was told repeatedly that I was knocking Velikovsky's view of this period without putting anything in its place. On the 19th February 1976 I wrote a 5 page letter ...
534. Sothic Dating and Historical Reconstructions [Articles]
... , we can use it to reanchor in the right place. I don't want to suggest there aren't any consequences to use here. We can use this to exploit any clues we find to date other things, but it doesn't have any particular effect on Velikovsky's proposals. You have to say that the twelfth dynasty was in the Valley while Ramses III was primarily in the Delta, but that doesn't require a big change. Questioner 2: I'm sorry, I have not read your paper, so I'm just a little confused. Are you placing the Middle Kingdom at -394 or is that for the Sothic dates? Rose: The -394 date is that one document from year 7 ...
... this 19th Dynasty king, Menophres or Amenophis, although thanks to the modernization of the Egyptian Dynasties, all sorts of revisions have been made which have vitiated the former lists of the 18th and 19th Dynasties, and as a result once again the truth is obliterated. All I need say at this moment is that Menophres was the son of Ramses II, Miammun, and that in the former's reign the Exodus took place under Moses according to Manetho, and so we begin to realize that the Flood epoch took place in a very vital period of pre-history, when, as we are told, the land of Egypt before the catastrophe suffered from the various plagues which compare with the ...
536. Sins Of The Father [Journals] [Aeon]
... ] David Rohl, Pharaohs and Kings (New York, 1995), p. 402, otherwise sympathetic to Velikovsky's cause, had this to say of the latter's habit of making one or another ruler the alter ego of another: "So, Velikovsky turned Seti I of the 19th Dynasty into Psamtek I of the 26th Dynasty and likewise Ramses II into Neko II. Even the most accommodating scholars found this methodology totally unacceptable and the archaeological evidence was wholly against such equations. Getting himself deeper and deeper into trouble he then equated Ramses III of the 20th Dynasty with Nectanebo I of the 30th Dynasty. In the end his whole thesis degenerated into farce with dynasties leapfrogging over each ...
537. The Pitfalls of Radiocarbon Dating [Journals] [Pensee]
... not in the first half of the fourteenth but in the middle of the ninth century. Thus, as I showed in detail in Vol. I of Ages in Chaos, there exists an error of ca. 540 years through the entire period covered by the 18th Dynasty. Even more important is that the dynasty of Seti the Great and Ramses II, termed the Nineteenth Dynasty, did not follow the Eighteenth; the Libyan (Dynasties 22nd to 23rd) and the Ethiopian (Dynasties 24th to 25th) periods intervened. The Libyan Dynasty of Sosenks and Osorkons reigned for 100 years only, instead of over 200; the Ethiopian Dynasty, however, is the only one that in ...
538. Assuruballit [Journals] [Kronos]
... which proved that all previous chronologies were too high", the age of the Assyrian kings of the period had to be reduced by 64 years.(9 )) However, to lower the age of Akhnaton enough, in order to make him a contemporary of Assuruballit, was impossible because conventional Egyptian chronology is built on the premise that Ramses I started to reign in -1322 and after Akhnaton and before Ramses I, Tutankhamen, Smenkhkare, Aye, and Haremhab must have reigned. About this M. B. Rowton wrote: The Mesopotamian evidence discussed in this article indicates 1356 for the accession of Assuruballit I. . . . Egyptologists believe that the lowest possible date for the ...
539. Bronze Age Multi-Site Destructions (A Preliminary Review) [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Late Bronze Age in the Northern Levant: The Evidence from Tell Nebi Mend, Syria' [25]. Part of his thesis has been published in the latest Levant [26], but there he only briefly suggests the possibility of a great earthquake [27]. Tell Nebi Mend is the site of ancient Qadesh where later on Ramesses II fought his famous battle with the Hittites. Bourke covers the stratigraphy and pottery of the Middle Bronze II and Late Bronze layers and is concerned to show that there is continuity from Middle to Late Bronze - no long hiatus. However, he does acknowledge destruction levels both at Qadesh and at other sites with which he compares the stratigraphy ...
540. Karl Popper and Evolutionary Theory (Vox Populi) [Journals] [Kronos]
... Urdamane...." does not contradict Velikovsky's understanding of Haremhab's crucial placement in the time of the Assyrian conquests in the first quarter of the seventh century. Such an alternate synchronism would also move Haremhab's rule by ca. 15 years, from -702 to -687 to -688 to -672, which would dispose of Gammon's criticism that Haremhab and Ramses I (Necho I) appear together though Necho I was appointed only in -671; it would reduce the Mininwy age problem; and it would eliminate his claim that Haremhab, still as governor, and Tirhaka (Taharqa) could not have been depicted together since Tirhaka started his rule only in -690.* Such an alternate date for ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.058 seconds |