| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: ram*ses in all categories
670 results found.
67 pages of results. 341. Whose Revision Is Questioned? [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... suggesting that those personages have to be put before 687. I think it is not safe to reconsider 18th and 19th dynasty dates without a very critical look (like Kerkhof's and mine) into the genealogies. Concerning the alternative Korbach promises, one is eager to study the general outline of it. He clearly accepts at least 180 years between Ramses II and Osorkon I. I presume he will leave the Libyans where they stood before Velikovsky, or approximately where I put them. Then he is obliged to put Ramses II in the 12th or 10th century. This means rejecting Ages in Chaos I, accepted until now in its main conclusions by all Velikovskians. Whose revision is to ...
342. Society News [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... of Peleg. Margaret Grant said in a pamphlet by Walker, Eden is said to be in Armenia. Ali Saheb said that Abraham came from Chaldea and was therefore Aryan! Tony Chavasse said that Ur of the Chaldees was in Armenia (Lake Van) not in Sumer. Margaret Grant agreed. In a digression, Jesse Lasken claimed that Ramesses III has to be c.400BC, as there Greek letters on his temple bricks. Tony Chavasse responded that Ramesses III cannot be later than Psamtech I or Shoshenq I - an impasse. There was then a break for tea. When discusiion resumed, Margaret Grant said that in Ebla the name David meant general' or destroyer' ...
343. Chronology of the Kings of Judah and Israel [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... /78, Vol. 2, No. 3). The result follows: 1057/1032 Ahmose 887/871 Amenhotep IV 1032/1011 Amenhotep I 873/871 Smenkhkare 1011/999 Thutmose I 871/862 Tutankhamun 999/988 Thutmose II 865/861 Ay 988/933 Thutmose III 8621853 Horemheb 987/967 Hatshepsut 853 Ramses I 9461921 Amenhotep II 8521841 Sethi I 921/913 Thutmose IV 841/777 Ramses II 913/876 Amenhotep III 777/769 Merneptah 769/763 Seti I 966 was the 5th year of Rehoboam, confirming for me the correctness of Gammon's framework. It is interesting to see that the "revised/revised" reign of Merneptah ...
344. The Mysterious Smenkhkare [Journals] [SIS Internet Digest]
... in all cases near the centre. In some cases -re is near the start, and in one case -nefer is immediately adjacent to -aten. Since this last form does not match any of the others, is it possible they were in fact reworked twice? The only two possible orthographic forms starting with re from anywhere near this era are Ramesses (too late) and Smenkhkare. So the cartouche under Tutankhamun appears to be that of "Smenkhkare beloved if Akenaten", an intermediate form between the first two of the variations noted at the start of the talk. This would seem to preclude the idea that Nefertiti took over Smekhkare's name after his early death (yet another theory ...
345. Forum [Journals] [SIS Review]
... shorter chronology and that this support is even greater when the dates are "corrected" by the tree-ring calibration factor. The dates still accumulate. For example in the issue of Radiocarbon for 1975 (vol. 17), p. 221-2, there are several dates for Egyptian material. Reeds from the wall of the well known Ramesseum of Ramesses II were again dated and again the result - at 1060 80bc (TF 1209) - favours the conversional date for that Pharaoh. When "corrected" by the tree rings the date falls into the 13th century or thereabouts. It is difficult to believe that this building could be dated so if Ramesses II reigned in the 7th century ...
346. Jericho [Journals] [Kronos]
... of legend and history. She was not led by any theory about the time of the Exodus, neither by that of Garstang who claimed Exodus in the days of Amenhotep II and Conquest in the days of Amenhotep III of the eighteenth dynasty (Habiru theory), nor by that of Albright that the Exodus took place in the days of Ramses II and the Conquest in the days of Merneptah (Israel Stele), both of the nineteenth dynasty. except that in agreement with all schemes of accepted chronology she expected to find the Old Testament confirmed and the great walls of Jericho dating from some time of the Late Bronze: The New Kingdom in Egypt, to which both the ...
347. Centuries of Darkness? - a Challenge to the Conventional Chronology [Journals] [SIS Review]
... J. Lieblein proposed a 200 year reduction; while in 1952 Immanuel Velikovsky, in a radical approach which involved changing the accepted order of the 19th and 20th Dynasties, proposed reductions of between 500 and 800 years. More recently, David Rohl has argued in favour of a 350 year reduction, one pillar of which is the identification of Ramesses II as the biblical Shishak' who plundered Solomon's temple around 925 BC. The 250 year reduction proposed in Centuries of Darkness, with its tentative identification of Ramesses III as Shishak, requires Dynasties 20-24 either to be accommodated in the 230 years preceding the 25th (Ethiopian) Dynasty, which conquered Egypt at the end of the 8th century ...
348. In Passing [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Grey, a further Adventist, is an Australian and visited Nuweiba with Wyatt in 1993-4, when he took his own film of the crossing site and the finding of more chariot wheels. This is shown as part of another video by Grey called And the Sea Will Tell'. The video starts with the birth of Moses. He accepts Ramesses II as the Pharaoh and makes the observation that the four statues of Ramesses II in the Cairo Museum all have different faces. (Anyone else noticed?). He surmises that the unfinished tomb 353 was started for Moses when he was Crown Prince. He has the Israelites following the age-old road from Succoth to Eilat until the Wadi ...
349. Was Hatshepsut the Queen of Sheba? [Articles]
... same reliefs. At the end of the campaign, Seti I is here, he is holding a group of captives by the hair, the god Amun is here, and he is about to club the captives to death in front of Amun as an offering. (11) Almost every famous pharaoh has contributed something to Karnak, including Ramesses II who in this scene depicts his battle at Kadesh against the Hittites- you can just see Ramesses here on his chariot and the battle going on all around. (12) Ramesses II again, this is the Ramesseum at Thebes, the biggest statue in Egypt, the statue of Ramesses II, now fallen onto its back. ...
350. Neo-Babylonians and Achaemenids [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... against the rebels. The story of how that mighty army was defeated on land and on water has already been told in great detail by Velikovsky, and needs no further elucidation from me. All we need to note is that the pharaoh known to the Greeks as Nectanebo I was one and the same as the man known to Egyptologists as Ramses III of the 20th Dynasty. One thing is undisputed: Artaxerxes II came into direct conflict with Egypt under a king named Nectanebo, and suffered a crushing defeat. Now we ask ourselves: Did Nabopolasser at any stage in his career confront the Egyptians on the field of battle? He certainly did. We are told that after the ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.049 seconds |
