| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: ram*ses in all categories
670 results found.
67 pages of results. 331. The Libyan Period In Egypt [Journals] [Kronos]
... Cf. E. Danelius, "Did Thutmose III Despoil the Temple in Jerusalem?" SISR II:3 (1977/78), pp. 64-79; and Velikovsky's response in Ibid., p. 80. - LMG] 6. See I. Velikovsky, "From the End of the Eighteenth Dynasty to the Time of Ramses II", the section titled "Pharaoh So" in KRONOS III:3 (Spring 1978), pp. 7-9. 7. P. Montet, Byblos et l'Egypte (Paris, 1928-29), pls. 36-38. 8. Ibid., p.53, fig. 17 and p.56, fig. 18 ...
332. Scarabs and Chronology [Journals] [Kronos]
... 1935. The site is eight miles north of Jerusalem, near the boundary between Israel and Judah. - JNS] 2 C. C. McCown, et al, Tell en-Nasbeh, Vol. 1(1947), p. 148. 3 [I . Velikovsky, "From the End of the Eighteenth Dynasty to the Time Of Ramses II," KRONOS III:3 (Spring 1978), pp. 3ff.; I. Velikovsky, "Cultural Aspects of the Libyan and Ethiopian Dynasties," KRONOS V 3 (Spring 1980), pp. 1-10. - LMG] 4 [Also see I.Velikovsky, "Scarabs," Pensee IVR VI ( ...
333. Venus. Supplement: Astronomy And Chronology Ch.3 (Peoples of the Sea) [Velikovsky]
... Quellen, II, 33, note. "Three Pillars" of World History The "astronomical chronology" is a framework of the scientific structure of Egyptian history and, consequently, of the history of the ancient world. Within this frame the dynasties of Manetho were placed along the centuries; the historical pharaohs were conjectured into Manetho's scheme. Ramses I of the Nineteenth Dynasty, whom Manetho does not mention, was identified as Menophres of Theon; the era of Menophres of Theon was identified as the Sothic period of Censorinus; the date, 139 of the present era, was taken as the end of that period and -1321 was fixed as the year of Ramses I; the ...
334. Gezer and the Mysterious Gates of Solomon [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... David, and the later destruction was the result of the Egyptian king, whom we have conclusively identified with Merneptah- and not Siamun as conventionally accepted. We would then expect to find strong Egyptian influence prior to this time, reflecting intermittent Egyptian hegemony over the area from the time of Thutmose III through the Amarna period and Seti I and Ramesses II. And so it was. Stratum VI and VII in Field VI "produced good quantities of Egyptian material." We have noted that Dever returned to Gezer in 1984 to further investigate the area associated with the "Solomonic Gateway." The reason involved the controversy over the relationship between the "outer wall" and this gateway ...
335. Solving the Exodus Mystery by Ted T. Stewart [Journals] [SIS Review]
... that Moses led the Egyptians against Cush and married Tharbis, the king's daughter, which could have occurred c. 1500 BC. Sesostris III built a city, presumed to be the Raamses' of the Bible, out of mud-bricks at Tell ed-Daba. Its remains, (the MBIIA finds), have been found below the city rebuilt by Ramesses II. Sesostris III used camps of Asiatics under Egyptian overseers (CAH) to build the city, just as described in the Bible. During MBII in Palestine, large fortified cities were built with steep artificial slopes. Stewart makes these the reason why Sesostris III and Amenemhet III built defensive walls at the entrance to Egypt. Stewart equates ...
336. Letters [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... 1966)) who was a contemporary of Kamose, the brother of Ahmose, the first king of the eighteenth dynasty, this would place Ahmose much earlier than King Saul whom Dr Velikovsky makes his contemporary. This would also mean that the Amarna tablets refer to the era of Saul and David, and that Shishak lived at the time of Ramesses II. (Shishak could be Shikshak' - conqueror of Syria' rather than a name). And Merenptah's sack of Gezer would have been in Solomon's time. He or Ramesses II would have been Shishak, since they conquered Syria. Walter Warshawsky, Forest Park, Illinois, U.S .A . Galactic Magnet?Dear ...
337. It's Time to Get Serious About Manetho [Journals] [SIS Review]
... ' against which the succession of dynasties could be ranged to permit meaningful correlations with neighbouring countries, the most obvious candidates being those in the Biblical record and the Mediterranean theatre. In terms of an effective chronology, how J.C . Prichard, a Scottish scholar, arrived at the date of -1147 for the commencement of the reign of Ramesses III is unknown. Since his book was published in 1819, nearly three years before Champollion's sensational September 22nd 1822 announcement that he had decoded the Rosetta Stone, it follows that he could not have based the deduction on hieroglyphic texts, none of which could provide a date in that format anyway. Even if based on work by a ...
... to show that a vague year was not in use during the time of the Ramessids has been derived from some inscriptions at Silsilis which refer to the dates on which sacred offerings were presented there to the Nile-god. As the dates 15th of Thoth and 15th of Epiphi are the same in all three inscriptions, although they cover the period from Rameses II. to Rameses III.- 120 years- it has been argued by Brugsch that a fixed year is in question. Brugsch points out that the two dates are separated by 65 days, that this is the exact interval between the Coptic festivals of the commencement of the flow and the marriage of the Nile the time of highest ...
339. Assyrians, Sodom, and Red Herrings [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... list. To put it mildly, this is unsubstantiated assumption. The catastrophist literature over the past five years has several valid challenges to this view. (4 ) Sanders' dates for the beginning and end of the archaeological periods appear to be unsubstantiated and whimsical, unattached to any convincing reasoning or theme. (5 ) The argument that Ramses III was Shishak appears bizarre. If we are to look for an Egyptian pharaoh who brought home enormous plunder and wealth, Velikovsky's splendid Thutmose III identification remains the most compelling. Nor is there any mystery as to where Ramses III got his booty- he took it from the Sea Peoples. In a private communication Sanders argued against my ...
340. The Amarna Age - an Introduction [Journals] [SIS Internet Digest]
... officials in order for them to swear oaths of loyalty. (This makes 12 years the maximum conceivable overlap of reigns). Could this have brought plague to Egypt? Members of the Hittite royal family are known to have succumbed to the disease - could the same have happened to members of Akhenaten's family? Some other Egyptian rulers (notably Rameses 2) made their daughters into "great queens" by marrying them, but Akhenaten was unique in the extent to which he did this and sought to have children by them. At least one and probably several appear to have died in childbirth. His mother, queen Tiye, is also depicted with a daughter in this era. ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.051 seconds |
