| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: ram*ses in all categories
670 results found.
67 pages of results. 221. Chapter 1 The Foundations of Ancient History [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... , Germany, Professor Lynn E. Rose, emeritus professor of the State University of New York at Buffalo, and Emmet J. Sweeney of Derry, Northern Ireland.1 Each of these historical revisionists has acknowledged his enormous debt to the trail-blazing work of Immanuel Velikovsky, whose published books: Ages in Chaos, Peoples of the Sea, Ramses II and his Time, as well as his unpublished historical works: The Dark Age of Greece and The Assyrian Conquest challenged the established conventional chronology. Velikovsky's revision not only overturned much of ancient history, but shortened the length of that chronology by at least 500 to 600 years. In this respect, his followers have gone beyond Velikovsky ...
222. The Egyptian Prince Moses [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... 1437-1399 Amenemhet III 1489-1444 THE EXODUS PHARAOH Amenemhet IV 1445-1437 Table I. THE POST-EXODUS PERIOD Eighteenth Dynasty (continued from Table I) Short Chronology Long Chronology (Monuments) (Manetho) Amenhotep III 1437-1399 Akhenaton 1409-1392 Acencheres 1399-1387 THE LONG DAY OF JOSHUA, 1397 Semenkh 1392-1389 Rathois 1387-1376 Tutankhamen 1389-1380 Acencheres 1376-1364 Ay 1352-1348 Acencheres 1364-1352 Horemheb 1348-1313 Nineteenth Dynasty Ramses I 1313-1312 Seti I 1312-1299 Ramses II 1299-1232 Mirneptah 1232-1220 Seti II 1220-1214 Siptah 1214-1210 Twosre 1210-1202 Table II. The Court where Moses Served. Certain features about this Exodus chronology must be highlighted. Being eighty years old at the Exodus, Moses would have been born during the reign of Sesostris III. Here I agree with Courville's placement of ...
223. Society News [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... use of, and subjecting to critical scrutiny, traditional accounts of Egyptian history preserved in later sources, such as Herodotus, Diodorus Siculus, Manetho and Josephus. There appeared to be a hard core of historical fact underlying such stories as those of Amenophis and Osarsiph (fragment 54 of Manetho) and of Sethosis (or Sethos, also called Ramesses) and Harrnais. His own view was that the usurper Osarsiph should be identified with Ramesses Siptah (whom he regarded as being quite distinct from Merenptah Siptah) and that Harmais should be identified with Amenmesse. It was agreed that further research was needed into the monumental evidence, to see what fresh light could be thrown on the sequence ...
224. Pharaoh So and the Libyan Dynasty [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... Sibitti-bi'ili of Byblos! This Sibitti-bi'ili, who is of course identical to Shipitbaal, was the son of Elibaal, the contemporary of Osorkon I. Our supposed date for Osorkon I (755) happens to be confirmed. Now we have to modify our 1979 opinion about the rising of the Libyans. I think that during the late years of Ramses II (recently dated by Gammon: 804-738) a prominent role could have been played by Sheshonq I and Osorkon I. After a relatively quiet time during the rule of Merenptah (738-730) there is room for Osorkon II to play an important part in the foreign policy of Egypt. In 702 Sennacherib met the kings of Egypt, ...
225. Out of the Desert? [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Raamses, built by Israelite slave labour, with Tell er Retabah and Tell el-Dab'a respectively. The former was abandoned between the Hyksos period and the 19th Dynasty, while the latter (which he also identifies as both Avaris and Pi-Ramesse) was abandoned between the early 18th Dynasty and the reign of Horemheb. This gives rise to the conclusion that Ramesses II, dated to the 13th century BC, remains the most likely pharaoh of the Exodus. Chapter III - Archaeology and a Late Bronze Age Exodus' - deals with the conflict between the biblical accounts of the Israelites in the wilderness being opposed by the kingdoms of Edom, Moab, and the Amorites and Nelson Glueck's conclusion that Transjordan ...
226. A Reply to Mr. Cohen [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... often improper) of the written records and archaeological evidence. While Velikovsky places Haremhab during the opening decades of the XIXth dynasty, Gammon places Haremhab as the immediate predecessor of the first three pharaohs of the XIXth dynasty. Thus whatever weaknesses may be contained in Gammon's arguments, it appears impossible to separate Haremhab from a time setting just prior to Ramses I, Seti the Great, and Ramses II. Thus Mr. Cohen fails to recognize that the general time placement of Haremhab in relationship to these three pharaohs is the same in both cases. The debate is therefore over the dating of dynasty XIX, the relevant issues of which Mr. Cohen neglects to mention. Exactly what the ...
227. On the Idenrification of Denien with Athenians and the "Double T" in P-R-S-TT [Journals] [Kronos]
... and t in Egyptian" plus added confusion on account of a "third consonant tj, which could conceivably have been used to render the theta of Athenians. ' Of course, tj itself is also confused in Egyptian with d and t" I would suggest looking at this problem from a different perspective. Since, in the time of Ramses III, Egyptian is shown to have a relationship with Hebrew via the use of Hebrew words in Egyptian, then we might look to the Hebrew language for a solution. Now in Hebrew the "th" (theta) in Athens is rendered by the last letter of the Hebrew alphabet. This last letter of the Hebrew alphabet is ...
228. Society News [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Third Intermediate Period The SIS Study Group met on 15th February 1997 to discuss the progress Bob Porter is making in his studies of the Third Intermediate Period (TIP). Bob began with charts to show the extent of the problem he was trying to solve. He broadly agreed with David Rohl's New Chronology' (NC), which has Ramesses II as Shishak. He also agreed with the orthodox view that Dynasty 26 starts with Psammetichus I in 664BC. He also agrees that the development of a convincing historical revision lies in successfully unraveling the chronology of the TIP. This view had led him into his present study of this most difficult period. His starting point is about 925BC ...
229. Ages in Chaos versus the 'New Chronologies' of Rohl and James [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Catastrophism Review 2001:2 (Jan 2002) Home | Issue Contents Letters Ages in Chaos versus the New Chronologies' of Rohl and James Phillip Clapham There was a frenetic rush to narrow the scope of a revision after the collapse of the ' Glasgow Chronology'. The race was on to get into print after it had become clear that Ramesses II could not be relocated in the 8th or 7th centuries BC - he was too important a figure to be marginalised. Subsequently, it was decided (with a warm glow) that the Biblical shishak could be identified with Ramesses II - or Ramesses III. However, the New Chronologies have discarded catastrophic events - in order to please ...
... Antiquities in the British Museum), when he claims that the Book of the Dead was contemporaneous with the first Egyptian Dynasty or even earlier, if we realize that it was the first Egyptian Dynasty after the Flood, that is to say, after c. 1322 BC, or, as chronology instances, after the end of the 19th Ramses Dynasty. In other words, the earlier Egyptian kings, including the 19th Ramses Dynasty, reigned elsewhere. This statement necessarily challenges the accuracy of the dynasties as interpreted by modern Egyptologists. The Ritual of the Book of the Dead was built round Osiris, once a living Egyptian monarch, who was slain by Set, it is unquestionably ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.054 seconds |
