| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: ram*ses in all categories
670 results found.
67 pages of results. 151. A Date Correction for Ramses II [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... From: SIS Workshop Vol 4 No 4 (Mar 1982) Home | Issue Contents A Date Correction for Ramses II Lester J. Mitcham I wish to challenge the dates proposed by the Glasgow chronologists for Ramses II. Messrs James, Bimson and Gammon have defined the first 18 years of the reign of Ramses II as being the years 804-786 BC,(1 ) and regard these dates as fitting into the known pattern of the wars between Syria and Israel, at a time when Ramses II would have been militarily active in this region. In his 5th regnal year Ramses II battled against the Hittite king Mutwallis at Kadesh: this would have occurred in 800 BC according to ...
152. Testing Rohl's Test of Time [Journals] [Aeon]
... more "meaty" text by which the overall chronological implications might be better assessed, although, in reality, there is more than enough information delivered to seal the doom of the whole concept. The large number of personal anecdotes is a nice touch which, for example, adds to the feeling that Rohl's discovery of the precious details concerning Ramesses' Year 8 investure of Shalem was providential, making the reader, as it were, a boon companion in this date with destiny and all that it implies. As an encyclopedic tome too, the book is nicely balanced and acts to invest the author with immediate, far reaching authority which may, in fact, prove undeserving, ...
153. Egyptian Dynasties 20-21 - Tony Rees responds [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... 1 )as they try to achieve a major compression and reduction in the dates for Egyptian dynasties 20-21. The results, at first glance, are not unreasonable and it is noted that all three separate attempts are in broad agreement on the overall timescale. Indeed, the dates proposed by Bob and David, with the exception of those for Ramesses XI and Shoshenq I, are very close. Because David's proposals are more comprehensive, the following comments are therefore directed, in the main, at his proposed dates. It is, however, noted that David believes that dates around 20-30 years earlier would still be preferable because of other material, not mentioned in this discussion .. ...
154. Chronological Implications of a Proper Identification of the Labyrinth: Part II [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... and 19th Dynasties was also consistent with the brief observation made in ref. [1 ] that the Linear B tablets, which are cross-dated to the Egyptian New Kingdom, contain Roman terms of governance and must be dated after c200 BC [5 ]. This possibility was also consistent with the presence of Greek letters in the palace tiles of Ramesses III, as discussed by Velikovsky in Peoples of the Sea, an argument confirmed by my own study of Velikovsky's sources and adopted in ref.[1 ]. It seemed to me that this evidence virtually demanded a Ptolemaic placement of much New Kingdom material and that while other anomalies did not absolutely require so late a placement of New ...
155. A Test of Time: Volume I the Bible - From Myth to History by David M. Rohl [Journals] [SIS Review]
... proposals was unveiled in a joint article, An Alternative to the Velikovskian Chronology for Ancient Egypt', which was first published in SIS Workshop, Volume 5:2 , in April 1983. In this original article, the authors agreed in synchronising Saul and David with the Amarna period and placing the Shishak' episode late in the reign of Ramesses II. Since their collaboration ceased, however, their views have diverged considerably. James has abandoned the Amarna/ early monarchy synchronism and placed the Shishak' event in the reign of Ramesses III, while Rohl now dates the sack of the Temple to Year 8 of Ramesses II. He has also collaborated closely with Bernard Newgrosh over a ...
156. Introduction (Ramses II and his Time) [Velikovsky]
... From "Ramses II and his Time" © 1978 by Immanuel Velikovsky | FULL TEXT NOT AVAILABLE Contents Introduction The more proper title for this volume would have been Ramses II and Nebuchadnezzar, since both of them play dominant roles in this volume, or in this part of history. But revealing in this way the subject of the book- and the contemporaneity of two well-known figures of antiquity, separated in conventionally written history by seven hundred years-would have added sensation to what is perforce a revolutionary reconstruction of the past. Although the entire work of reconstruction covers over twelve hundred years, each volume is organized in such a way that it presents, as far as feasible, a separate ...
157. The Art Of Warfare. Part I Ch.3 (Peoples of the Sea) [Velikovsky]
... " © 1977 by Immanuel Velikovsky | FULL TEXT NOT AVAILABLE Contents The Art Of Warfare Warriors of the Peoples of the Sea THE SOLDIERS of the Peoples of the Sea, the Tjeker, the Shekelesh, the Teresh, the Weshesh, and the Sardan, were from the Asia Minor region. The Denien, however, are referred to by Ramses III as "Peoples of the Islands". The conclusion that these soldiers were archaic Greeks has already been arrived at by scholars who explain the events narrated and illustrated by Ramses III as a Greek invasion of Egypt that took place soon after the fall of Troy: more properly these particular warriors would be described as Mycenaean Greeks and their ...
158. The "Forgotten Empire". Ch. 4. (Ramses II and his Time) [Velikovsky]
... From "Ramses II and his Time" © 1978 by Immanuel Velikovsky | FULL TEXT NOT AVAILABLE Contents Chapter IV The "Forgotten Empire"Pictographic Script and the Cuneiform Archive of the "Hittites" At the end of the eighteenth century bas-reliefs with peculiar pictographic inscriptions were noticed and pointed out by travellers passing near Ivriz, on the plateau of Asia Minor. Later travellers saw similar pictorial signs carved on stone that had been re-used in a building at the bazaar of Hamath in northern Syria. The same peculiar signs were observed on slabs in the area of Jerablus-Carchemish on the bank of the Euphrates, and later on the site of ancient Babylon and in other places. They are ...
159. Dating the Amarna Letters [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... dating is wrong by about 200 years and that his equation of Shishak and Thutmose III together with his el-Amarna identifications are also incorrect by reason of the same erroneous chronological yardstick. Rohl and Newgrosh prefer to move the 18th Dynasty some 200 years earlier in time, i.e ., nearer the conventional dating, and to equate Shishak with Ramesses II. It is interesting that Gunnar Heinsohn's Mesopotamian Reconstruction which is favoured by this writer as being the most valid post-Velikovsky revision and most typical of the latter's own work, involves the contention that Rohl and Newgrosh have moved 200 years in the wrong direction! Heinsohn favours a 7th century Amarna date. Perhaps the most curious feature of the ...
160. Are the Peleset Philistines or Persians? [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... a subsequent work would be forthcoming to deal with this problem. Some twenty-five years were to elapse before this promise was met with the appearance of a series of volumes. Critical to his attempt to demonstrate the feasibility of such compression was the premise that the Peleset of the Sea Peoples, who attempted to invade Egypt in the eighth year of Rameses III, were not the Philistines as had long been held by scholars generally. They were rather to be identified with the Persians of the 4th century B.C . Among his first supports for this rather astonishing premise was the claim that the Egyptian word transliterated as "Peleset" could just as feasibly be made to read "Pereset ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.049 seconds |
