| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: dating in all categories
2621 results found.
263 pages of results. 321. The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... From: Catastrophism and Ancient History VIII:1 (Jan 1986) Home | Issue Contents The Libyans in Egypt: Resolving the Third Intermediate Period Martin Sieff Central to solving the perplexing chronology of the Third Intermediate Period in Egypt is the dating of the Twenty-Second (Libyan) Dynasty. In "The Age of Mars" I argued for a "naturally stretched out" Bible chronology for the eighth century B.C ., following Martin Anstey,[1 ] and for the identification of Uzziah-Azariah, king of Judah, with Arzu the Asiatic who ruled in Egypt between the Nineteenth and Twentieth Dynasties, an identification first made by Keith LeFlem.[2 ] On my " ...
322. A Different View on the Chronology of Hazor [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... , while the new Velikovskian scale puts him in the Iron Age, c. 950 B.C . In particular, it is the Mycenaean ware that is at odds between the two systems. Does Mycenaean III ware indicate the fourteenth and thirteenth centuries or does it indicate the ninth and eighth? In discussing the importance of Mycenaean ware in dating, Dr. Yadin writes: The designation Mycenaean pottery is applied by archaeologists to a specially and easily recognized type of pottery that originated in mainland Greece, mainly within the Mycenaean culture, and was found all over the Aegean, as well as in Egypt and the Eastern Mediterranean coasts. It is sub-divided into Mycenaean I, II and ...
323. Bookshelf [Journals] [SIS Review]
... of his work will find their long wait for the book well recompensed. Chapter One, "Twelfth or Fourth Century?", introduces us to the evidence that a distortion of some eight hundred years may lie behind the conventional scheme of Egyptian history when it refers to the time of Ramesses III and the XXth Dynasty, which is usually dated to the 12th century BC. It begins with a detailed description of the tiles of Ramesses III from Tell el-Yahudiya, which bear Greek letters incised on the reverse during the process of manufacture. Photographs and full descriptions of these tiles allow the reader to judge for himself the veracity of these letters - they are not only letters of the ...
324. "The Basest Of The Kingdoms". Part 2 Ch.2 (Peoples of the Sea) [Velikovsky]
... people, and ruined its temples, and for generations thereafter, through most of the Persian period. When Golenishchev purchased the papyrus with Ourmai's letter of laments, he obtained in the same transaction a papyrus containing another tale of woe-the story of Wenamon's errand to Byblos on the Syrian coast. Like the letter of Ourmai, the travelogue of Wenamon dates from the Twenty-first Dynasty; both were copied by the same hand; but it is understood that Wenamon's story relates events several generations more recent. Whereas Ourmai's letter was translated and published only recently (in 1961), Wenamon's story was published long ago, actually by Golenishchev himself in 1899. No document better pictures Egypt's lowly international position ...
325. The habiru as the 'ibrim of I Samuel and the implications for the 'new chronology' [Journals] [SIS Review]
... and the parallel between the two terms produces (for orthodox scholars) a habiru-problem'. The reader has a choice: accept the equation or explain the habiru-problem. Instead of evaluating the ibrim-problem in I Samuel in the light of the literary usage of habiru in the el-Amarna Letters (as I have done), Phillip's criticism centres on the date which I believed marked the disappearance of the appellation habiru from the documents, i.e . by the end of LB II, or in terms of the conventional chronology, c.1200-1150 BC. I had used this date to support the revision of Old World chronology by stating that if the habiru are still found in I Samuel ...
326. An Alternative to the Velikovskian Chronology for Ancient Egypt [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... the ancient Near East could be developed with Ages in Chaos as its starting point. An incomplete model embodying this approach subsequently became known as the "Glasgow Chronology". Since the first airing of the "Glasgow Chronology" much work has been done to substantiate the proposals therein (for example see John Bimson's studies on "An Eighth Century Date for Merenptah", SISR III:2 and "Dating the Wars of Seti I", SISR V:1 ). However, in spite of this work and other more general attempts at an overall revision (see "A Solution for the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt" by Phillip Clapham, SISW 4:3 ), ...
327. Discussion on Velikovsky, Victor Clube's book [Articles]
... century to about the first half of the 4th century. However, there is a tremendous amount of evidence which seems to indicate that they were ruling no later than the 7th century. There is evidence, for example, from Spain of pottery with the scarabs of two or three XXIInd Dynasty Pharaohs, which is in architecture that has been dated on stylistic grounds to no later than about the first quarter of the 7th century, and among the loot that was found in one of the Assyrian palaces you find a monument or something which is marked with one of the Takelots, one of the kings of the XXIInd Dynasty which was quite clearly looted from Sidon by Esarhaddon, King ...
328. Chronological Placements of the Dynasties of Manetho [Journals] [SIS Review]
... earlier dynasties some Persian or Ptolemaic period epigraphic material written in the Egyptian language that manifests centralised Egyptian rule, Egyptologists have reinforced the idea that many of Manetho's dynasties ruled all of Egypt rather than more limited areas. An alternative interpretation is proposed in which Manetho's dynasties are treated as largely concurrent, regional kingdoms, the earliest of which may not date before the mid-2nd millennium BC and may not have been located in Egypt. A basic assumption of Egyptologists, including James and Rohl, is that thirty-one dynasties ruled Egypt before the Ptolemies. They further assume that many of these dynasties ruled all of Egypt consecutively. The concept of an extended dynastic framework is based upon epitomes of the 3rd ...
329. 'No Impact': René Gallant (1906-1985) [Books]
... the now sadly separate sciences of History, Archaeology, Astronomy, Mathematics, Geology and Biology in his truly interdisciplinary book of 1964 [4 ] . But opinions of the merits of this book have been as divided as opinions on the meteorite-impact hypothesis' as an explanation of mass extinctions in the geological record. In a letter to me (dated 23/9 /1994) the pioneer of meteoritics, Robert Dietz (1914-1995) [5 ] wrote that Bombarded Earth had "little scientific merit. It is the work of a rank amateur and, if anything, set the science of impactology' back". William Glen, on the other hand, author of The Mass-Extinction ...
330. Cosmos & Chronos Symposium report [Journals] [SIS Internet Digest]
... that the entire Middle Kingdom of Egypt (or at least the 13th and 14th dynasties) needs to be down-dated to after the New Kingdom (one complete Sothic period later than usually accepted.) Astronomical evidence: Luft's El-Lahun papyri, discovered in the 1890's, now in former East Germany. Among these documents were 36 papyri that contain both dates and astronomical configurations that are usuable for retrocalculations. Of those 36, 18 have dates and configurations which match the traditionally accepted dating in the 19th century B.C . Rose's revised dating has a much better record 34 of the date/configurations have exact matches in the 4th century B.C . Of the two which don't match ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.049 seconds |
