Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
Search results for: chronolog* in all categories
2197 results found.
220 pages of results. 311. June 15, 762 BCE: A Mathematical Analysis of Ancient History [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... From: The Velikovskian Vol 2 No 3 (1994) Home | Issue Contents June 15, 762 BCE: A Mathematical Analysis of Ancient History Robert T. Russell The core proposition to be discussed in this chronological treatise is that Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky's date of February 26, 747 BCE, for the cataclysm of the ancient 8th century, is not correct. To be precise, this cosmic and geological upheaval took place on June 15, 762 BCE, the traditional date of the so-called "Great Eclipse." Although the notation "BCE" (Before the Common Era) is used with the title of this treatise, all dates mentioned are derived from the astronomical base ...
312. Chapter 8 Mesopotamia and Ghost Empires [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... the Greeks under the Seleucid rulers [who as foreigners dominated his homeland] the [great] antiquity of Assyro- Babylonian history and therefore he extended that history into tens of thousands of years."1 Also as with Egypt, there are a number of these lists which have come to light. Therefore, the early foundation of Mesopotamian chronology was built on the same kinds of evidence as that of ancient Egypt. That is, the foundation of that chronology was constructed on historical documentation rather than empirical scientific facts. The fundamental error, this author submits, lies in the way the problem of chronology was attacked. As we will see again, many of the very same ...
313. The Pyramid Age, by Emmet J Sweeney (Review) [Journals] [SIS Review]
... From: SIS Chronology & Catastrophism Review 2001:1 (Apr 2001) Home | Issue Contents The Pyramid Age by Emmet J Sweeney Domra Publications, 65 Constable Road, Corby, Northants. 1999 Reviewed by John Crowe 1. Introduction Emmet Sweeney has been a contributor to SIS publications since 1986, and this is the third book he has had published. The second, The Genesis of Israel and Egypt, came out in 1997. To have had three books published is a tremendous achievement for which he deserves much credit. This is a tribute to his tireless energy and enthusiasm for his chosen subject. His second book focussed mainly on the Sojourn and Exodus eras but closed ...
314. The Restoration of Ancient History [Articles]
... , whereas in the very same territories modern archaeology revealed sensationally ancient civilizations unknown before the late 19th century? V. Reconnecting occidental and oriental progress of civilization. VI. The restoration of ancient Israel by abandoning fundamentalist dates of historical biblical narratives and pseudo- scholarly dates of strata in the land of Israel. VII. Synchronization of ancient Eurasian chronology with the chronology of ancient China. In the last 150 years the learned world was time and again struck by the discovery of lost nations and forgotten empires which were so ancient that even the best historians of antiquity had never heard of them. This caused great surprise because these superancient civilizations were found in territories which were otherwise well known ...
315. A New Interpretation of the Assyrian King List [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... King List" by Lester Mitcham is disarmingly simple. He contends that Assur rabi (II) was not the son of Assur nasir apli (I ), but rather the son of a previous Assur nasir apli, who was the son of Tukulti Ninurta (I ). With this as a point of departure Mitcham proceeds to re-align the chronology of Babylonia with respect to the dual Assyrian royal line that emerges from this repositioning. That Assur nasir apli, the son of Tukulti Ninurta (I ) had played a role in the revolt against his father has been suggested before by Poebel and Weidner,1 although he is not considered to have played any further role in that short-lived ...
316. Failure of a Concept? [Journals] [SIS Review]
... . While attending members may have gained similar impressions from a number of the ongoing discussions, one of the more important issues of dispute will - very briefly put - at once illustrate as well as substantiate this analysis for other readers, too. I refer to the new idea advanced by our history experts, and strongly opposed to Dr Velikovsky's chronological reconstruction, that the 18th Dynasty in Egypt was not followed (around -830) by the Libyans (22nd and 23rd Dynasties), and the Ethiopians (25th Dynasty), but immediately by the 19th Dynasty, in the same way as the conventional historians have it. If our Editor is kind enough to find a small space in ...
317. The Ages of Bristlecone Pine [Journals] [Pensee]
... and insects; and needles that are retained for 20 to 30 years, providing a photosynthetic capacity for spanning many years of stressful conditions (2 ). Whatever the reasons for their success in survival, there can be little doubt that these trees are the oldest living things. The study of their wood is pertinent to climatology as well as chronology. Background of Tree-Ring Dating The techniques and theories of tree ring dating (dendrochronology) have their foundation in the work of A.E . Douglass in the early part of this century (3 ). Douglass and his successors, Glock, Shulman, et al., were interested in climatic variations over long periods of time and ...
318. Tony Rees on Lasken's chronology [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... From: SIS Chronology and Catastrophism Workshop 1995 No 2 (June 1995) Home | Issue Contents FORUM Tony Rees on Lasken's chronology It would be helpful if Jess Lasken could answer some questions about his chronology. 1. What was the date for the fall of Troy and who was Manetho's contemporary 19th Dynasty Thuoris/Polybus? Jess seems to equate Alexander with 20th Dynasty Setnacht and Ptolemy I with three kings, namely 18th Dynasty Thutmose III/ 18th Dynasty Horemheb/ 19th Dynasty Ramesses II. Finally, he equates Ptolemy II with 19th Dynasty Ramesses II. Because of this latter identification, Ptolemy I therefore also equates with Seti I. 2. The grandson of 19th Dynasty Ramesses ...
319. Chapter 15 Dark Ages Based on Dark Scholarship [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... were those two hundred years during which darkest night appeared to have descended . . . Those missing pages, which seemed to have been torn out of history, prompted them [historians] to make the wildest conjectures. "All their theories were false. ". . . Yet it remains astonishing that no one thought of subjecting the established chronology of events . . . to a searching criticism. Surely someone should have guessed, even if he had not been able to prove it at once, that what had gone wrong was the whole system of dating. Surely it should have occurred to someone that a people's history cannot stop dead for two [to five] hundred years ...
320. The Chronology of Israel and Judah Part I [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... From: Catastrophism and Ancient History VII:2 (July 1985) Home | Issue Contents The Chronology of Israel and Judah Part I D. Hickman 1. Introduction The purpose of this paper is to establish a logical chronology based upon the information preserved in the Old Testament. Perhaps the most famous of such chronologies are the attempts of Irish Archbishop James Ussher (1581-1656) and, in our time, Edwin R. Thiele. Ussher's researches led him to set the date of the creation of Adam at 4004 B.C . His chronology is still found sometimes in the margins of many Bibles. Thiele specialized in his work on the time of the Hebrew kings. His ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.050 seconds |