Catastrophism.com
Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences
Archaeology astronomy biology catastrophism chemistry cosmology geology geophysics
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
Home  | Browse | Sign-up


Search All | FAQ

Where:
  
Suggested Subjects
archaeologyastronomybiologycatastrophismgeologychemistrycosmologygeophysicshistoryphysicslinguisticsmythologypalaeontologypsychologyreligionuniformitarianismetymology

Suggested Cultures
EgyptianGreekSyriansRomanAboriginalBabylonianOlmecAssyrianPersianChineseJapaneseNear East

Suggested keywords
datingspiralramesesdragonpyramidbizarreplasmaanomalybig bangStonehengekronosevolutionbiblecuvierpetroglyphsscarEinsteinred shiftstrangeearthquaketraumaMosesdestructionHapgoodSaturnDelugesacredsevenBirkelandAmarnafolkloreshakespeareGenesisglassoriginslightthunderboltswastikaMayancalendarelectrickorandendrochronologydinosaursgravitychronologystratigraphicalcolumnssuntanissantorinimammothsmoonmale/femaletutankhamunankhmappolarmegalithicsundialHomertraditionSothiccometwritingextinctioncelestialprehistoricVenushornsradiocarbonrock artindianmeteorauroracirclecrossVelikovskyDarwinLyell

Other Good Web Sites

Society for Interdisciplinary Studies
The Velikovsky Encyclopedia
The Electric Universe
Thunderbolts
Plasma Universe
Plasma Cosmology
Science Frontiers
Lobster magazine

© 2001-2004 Catastrophism.com
ISBN 0-9539862-1-7
v1.2


Sign-up | Log-in


Introduction | Publications | More

Search results for: bible in all categories

1131 results found.

114 pages of results.
171. Evolution from Space [Articles]
... as you know is concerned with the Biblical creation on one side and the scientific creation, the Big Bang, on the other, and people are forever trying to compare and contrast these two without ever looking to see whether in fact they should be comparing and contrasting them. My argument is that they shouldn't. The creation story of the Bible has got nothing whatsoever to do with the creation of the Universe or the creation of the Earth itself, it is simply the description of a particular period after a catastrophe. I intend to build up from there and argue that Adam and Eve weren't the first ever creatures, they were merely survivors of the flood; they were told ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  01 Jul 2001  -  URL: /online/pubs/articles/talks/sis/840324cw.htm
172. Avaris and El-Arish (Forum) [Journals] [Kronos]
... can, however, be easily accommodated as I will show in my forthcoming book Human Sacrifice, Monotheism, Killing Taboo, Apokalyptic Fear, Jew Hatred (Frankfurt/M ., 1985). I would like to explain that my problems with such a late date for Hebrew human sacrifice derive from the conventional, i.e ., Bible fundamentalist, date for Abraham the patriarch. Since my work deals with the hitherto unsolved problem concerning the rise of monotheism, which I saw, and still see, as being the result of the abolition of human sacrifice in honor of deified celestial bodies, I decided to utilize the Abrahamic lore which deals precisely with such a succession of ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/kronos/vol1003/083forum.htm
173. Discussion Comments From the Floor [Journals] [Aeon]
... . 49-55) is an extremely curious piece of revisionist Velikovsky, with amateur psychoanalysis. While he credits Velikovsky's willingness to question biblical history- by the example of changing one word (" firstborn")- he ignores completely Velikovsky's much greater changes in biblical history: first, Velikovsky denied completely the Genesis account of creation as presented in the Bible, but of much greater importance, he denied a miraculous basis for any of the wonders- from the plagues of Egypt, to the waters parting and the Earth "standing still," by giving them all natural explanations. Whelton notes one American Indian legend that Velikovsky quoted-quite broadly hinting that it might be only a local event. ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  21 Aug 2004  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/aeon/vol0201/108discu.htm
174. Saturn's Flare-ups [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... reason he supplied. Saturn, it seems, was disrupted more than once. This had already been suggested, if only in passing, by Harold Tresman and Brendan O'Gheoghan,(14) and proper credit should have been duly given. Even so, it is somewhat peremptory to state, as Eggleton did, that "According to the Bible, Saturn definitely exploded twice" (emphasis mine). For one thing, Saturn, as such, is not even mentioned in the Bible. For another, it is difficult to see how the Bible can be made to assert anything on the strength of missing words. Velikovsky's treatment of these missing words, concerning the light of ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/workshop/vol0501/07satrn.htm
175. Moderating the Middle Ages [Journals] [SIS Review]
... '. In Forgeries of the Middle Ages [3 ], however, he suggests this period was lengthened to increase ecclesiastical, especially papal, venerability. Millenarianism was common in popular Judaism of the first century BC/AD, as well as the idea that Judgement Day would come 6,000 years after Creation. Authors of the Septuagint Bible therefore increased the age at which each of the patriarchs begat his son in the genealogies of early Genesis by 100 years, with the highest of motives: prompted by wishful thinking, pushing back the date of Creation would bring Judgement Day that much closer. Events portrayed in both Old and New Testaments are both treated by Fomenko as more ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/review/v1999n2/04middle.htm
176. An Answer to "The Danunians and the Velikovsky Revision" [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... a fabrication. Archaeologically, epigraphically, and paleographically there is no Hebrew in the Near or Middle East- nor in Egypt- before the schism of Roboam. I have seen the first book of Velikovsky, but not Ages in Chaos; nevertheless, I suppose that all his efforts, like so many Exegetes before him, attempt to make Bible events agree with the history and geography of Egypt and the Near and Middle East. I do not understand why nobody asks the question in another way: if the official version is not plausible- if each Exegete fights to prove his version is better than another's- if agreement is impossible, is it not because the things in question ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/cat-anc/vol0501/57dan.htm
... From: In the Beginning: God by H. S. Bellamy CD Home | Contents In the Beginning: God Bibliography The Holy Bible: Authorised Version. J. Skinner: A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on Genesis. 1930. S. R. Drower: The Book of Genesis. 1905 W. H. Bennet: Genesis (The Century Bible). 1901. H. Holzinger: Genesis. 1894. C. F. A, Dillmann: Genesis (translated by W. B.Stevenson). 1897. J. F. R. Gunkel: Genesis, 1910. D. E. Hart-Davies: The Genesis of Genisis.1932. F. ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  26 Mar 2007  -  URL: /online/pubs/books/bellamy/god/bibliography.htm
... familiar to us, a castle keep, an observation tower, or a church steeple- though they are direct descendants of the artificial hills; rather we should think of the tower as having the form of a mound, or ziqqurat, or step pyramid, often with an altar on top. However, according to the myth preserved in the Bible, this tower of theirs was never finished and they were scattered abroad from thence upon the face of all the Earth: and they left off to build the city'. The reason given is that their language was confounded'; a thoroughly unsatisfactory explanation, for though a god may be able to strike an individual dumb- and that ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  26 Mar 2007  -  URL: /online/pubs/books/bellamy/moons/16-tower.htm
179. Letter to the Editor from W. T. Black [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... From: Catastrophism and Ancient History II:1 (Aug 1979) Home | Issue Contents Letter to the Editor W. T. Black Editor, C&AH: Based on a misreading of the Bible, most people believe there was only one Flood, but there is abundant evidence of two floods. Many scientists today recognize that fact. Too many readers accept the Bible as merely a religious book, little realizing that it is also a very important historical document. For many years Biblical scholars, archaeologists, and even geologists searched for evidence of Noah's Flood in Mesopotamia, ignoring the fact that the flood was world wide. Despite many thousands of dollars spent in such ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/cat-anc/vol0201/69lett.htm
180. The Answer to Clapham's Question: Revise! [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... Herodotus and ever since have been inventing ways to discredit him that are based in the final analysis on nothing more than the original arbitrary selection of the Manethonian framework. If Clapham and more conventional scholars would stop accepting this dogma and applied the same standards of historiography and literary criticism and analysis to the epitomes of Manetho as they do to the Bible, the Manethonian framework and the chronology that is dependent upon it would be quickly junked as untenable. When these chronologies are straightened out, most of what Clapham and other modern Bible commentators have opined about Biblical chronologies and historicity will have to be reconsidered and, no doubt, jettisoned. I agree with Clapham that it is likely, ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 35  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/cat-anc/vol1501/69answer.htm
Result Pages: << Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next >>

Search powered by Zoom Search Engine



Search took 0.040 seconds