Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
Search results for: amarna in all categories
352 results found.
36 pages of results. 341. Forum [Journals] [SIS Review]
... may take on the character of a vowel in unstressed syllables, as is clear from numerous alternative writings in which it is omitted; this regular syncope is a further pointer to the phonetic quality of the "w ". The Temple in Jerusalem?Sir, In SISR II:3 , pp. 85-6, Dr Velikovsky discussed references in Amarna letters 74 and 290 to a place called Bet-NIN.IB. He followed J. Lewy's suggestion that this should be rendered Bit Sulmani or, in Hebrew, Beth Sulman, and suggested further that here we have a reference to the Temple of Solomon. I am not qualified to comment from a philological standpoint on the equation NIN. ...
342. Evidence of the Prophets and Egypt [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... ) while Haremhab ruled perhaps 59 years (c . 853-794). Haremhab claimed military victories by him in Syria (Khor) which had not been possible in the time of his predecessors (ANET, 251). Comprehensive discussions of this period have been given by Alan R. Schulman (" Some Observations on the Military Background of the Amarna Period." JARCE, III, 1964, 51-69; "Excursus on the Military Officer" Nakhtmin." Ibid., 124-26; "The Berlin Trauerrelief' (No. 12411) and Some Officials of Tut'ankhamun and Ay." Ibid., IV, 1965, 55-68). 34. Alan Gardiner, "The Memphite ...
343. A Solution for the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... do not have the connections Velikovsky claimed for them. 7 John Bimson, "An 8th-century date for Merenptah", SISR III:2 , p. 57. 8 Velikovsky, op. cit., p. 8: also Ages in Chaos, p. 174. However, his proposal assigns the 22nd Dynasty to the period between Amarna (9th century BC) and the 26th Dynasty (which becomes the 19th) of the 7th century BC. Velikovsky is forced to turn the internal history of the 22nd Dynasty inside out in that Shoshenq I becomes Shoshenq IV. 9 K. A. Kitchen, The Third Intermediate Period of Egypt (Warminster 1973), p. ...
344. Monitor [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... Sacrifice (New York Times, June 2005; Focus, National Geographic, April 2005, pp. 106-121; NYU, Spring 2005, pp. 47-49) Evidence for what could be the earliest glass producing factory in Egypt has been found in the Delta and dates from the time of Ramses the Great, although two large furnaces found at Amarna are presented as a rival claim. Remains of boats with sail and mast ropes and thick planks of cedar have been found on the Red Sea coast. At Abydos, where the early Egyptian pharaohs were buried, the first king, Aha, was buried along with 5 others, including a 4 year old boy. This is taken ...
345. The Two Jehorams [Journals] [SIS Review]
... a typically moralistic digression on the power of fate, as illustrated by the death of Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead - Antiquities of the Jews VII, xv, 5-6. 5. W. F. Albright considered that "a minimum chronological scope of twenty-seven years and a maximum of just over thirty" should be allowed for the correspondence - "The Amarna Letters from Palestine", CAH fascicle 51, p.5 . 6. Ginzberg, loc. cit. 7. Editor's note: This instance of double dating is not unique (cf. II Kings 8:25 and II Kings 9:29), and far from being a stumbling block for Biblical chronologists such double dates ...
346. Introduction - Ages in Chaos? [Journals] [SIS Review]
... were not Assyrians', Aeon I(4 ), 1988, pp. 119-125; D. Cardona, The two Sargons and their successors', Aeon I(5 ), 1988, pp. 5-37, I(6 ), 1988, pp. 72-97; D. Shelley-Pearce & B. Newgrosh, Forum - Dating the Amarna letters', C&CW 1989:1 , pp. 20-22; G. Heinsohn, B.Aaronson & E.Sweeney, Three views of Heinsohn's chronology', C&CW 1990:1 , pp. 15-21; H. Illig, The past comes down', C&CW 1991:1 , pp. ...
347. The Ark in Action [Books] [de Grazia books]
... try to rebuild the city.] In the time of David a settlement of some kind was established on the site, though this was very small and no traces of it have been found on the mound, pottery and scarab from Tomb 5 being the only indication of its existence. A proper town .. . was rebuilt in the Amarna period, ninth century B.C .. . The blast must have included cosmic electricity as well as seismism, because one excavator, John Garstang, found plenty of evidence of intense fires; storerooms were burned; stone houses were reduced to calcinated debris and white ash was overlain with thick layers of charcoal and burnt debris[70 ...
348. Discussion [Journals] [Aeon]
... demonstrates so excellently, Greek history began in the 6th century rather than in the 8th.(18) For many years now Gunnar Heinsohn has also been demonstrating the need to advance Velikovsky's foreshortening of conventional chronology by another couple of centuries. Perhaps one of the most cogent keys in the Heinsohn reconstruction is to have established the time of the Amarna letters as being in the late 7th century.(19) In order to retain any kind of consensus in the post-Velikovsky debate, it is clear that there must be some kind of synthesis between the excellent word of both the mythologists and the historians. The current lack of such a synthesis is apparent from Cardona's quoting of F. ...
349. Genealogical Evidence for a Shortening of the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... HPM's) and the Abydene high priests of Osiris are known to have been closely related (see, e.g . H. de Meulenaere, CdE, 41, 1966, 223ff.). Another advantage of the preceding scheme is that the birth of Ptahmose would probably be pushed back to no later than the immediate aftermath of the Amarna period (cf. Fig. 1), thus bringing his naming into what would be an attractive connection with the surfeit of high ranking Ptahmoses c. the reign of Amenhotep III (R . Anthes, ZAS, 72, 60ff.). Such a dating of L.708/883's Ptahmose would fit very well, chronologically ...
350. The Velikovsky Affair [Books] [de Grazia books]
... inserted in Aegean, Mesopotamian, or Anatolian histories. William F. Albright, Spence Professor of Semitic Language at Johns Hopkins University, reviewed and rejected Velikovsky's second book in the New York Herald Tribune for April 20, 1952. Albright's only specific argument was that Velikovsky had mistaken the cuneiform plural sign, mesh, in some of the El Amarna letters for the name of the Moabite King Mesh (a ) But in his text Velikovsky twice called attention to the fact that in several instances in these letters the conventional reading cannot apply, since the grammatical construction definitely pertains to an individual - a rebellious vassal of the king of Samaria (Sumur), well known from the Bible ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.044 seconds |