Catastrophism.com
Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences
Archaeology astronomy biology catastrophism chemistry cosmology geology geophysics
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
Home  | Browse | Sign-up


Search All | FAQ

Where:
  
Suggested Subjects
archaeologyastronomybiologycatastrophismgeologychemistrycosmologygeophysicshistoryphysicslinguisticsmythologypalaeontologypsychologyreligionuniformitarianismetymology

Suggested Cultures
EgyptianGreekSyriansRomanAboriginalBabylonianOlmecAssyrianPersianChineseJapaneseNear East

Suggested keywords
datingspiralramesesdragonpyramidbizarreplasmaanomalybig bangStonehengekronosevolutionbiblecuvierpetroglyphsscarEinsteinred shiftstrangeearthquaketraumaMosesdestructionHapgoodSaturnDelugesacredsevenBirkelandAmarnafolkloreshakespeareGenesisglassoriginslightthunderboltswastikaMayancalendarelectrickorandendrochronologydinosaursgravitychronologystratigraphicalcolumnssuntanissantorinimammothsmoonmale/femaletutankhamunankhmappolarmegalithicsundialHomertraditionSothiccometwritingextinctioncelestialprehistoricVenushornsradiocarbonrock artindianmeteorauroracirclecrossVelikovskyDarwinLyell

Other Good Web Sites

Society for Interdisciplinary Studies
The Velikovsky Encyclopedia
The Electric Universe
Thunderbolts
Plasma Universe
Plasma Cosmology
Science Frontiers
Lobster magazine

© 2001-2004 Catastrophism.com
ISBN 0-9539862-1-7
v1.2


Sign-up | Log-in


Introduction | Publications | More

Search results for: sothic in all categories

226 results found.

23 pages of results.
... .C . On the contrary, intercalary months from Kassite period Babylonia are found, and in the numbers expected. (See Brinkman's Materials and Studies for Kassite History.) 3) Mage mentioned Daressy's (not Breasted's) reading of the date of the Osorkon flood inscription, "which, if valid, flatly refutes the entire system of Sothic dating". It will not do that. I have a transcription and comments from an epigrapher at the site. There are perfectly good epigraphic reasons for reading the month number as either two or three, rather than one, either of which would fall well within the normal range. I will discuss them in a paper on Velikovsky's ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 11  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/kronos/vol0902/085forum.htm
152. Society News [Journals] [SIS Review]
... 2 ]. Finally, Rohl dealt with another criticism by Kitchen. There is a text at Dier el Medina, drawn to his attention as Graffiti No. 862' in a publication by J Jansen. This mentions workmen on the hills on the West Bank viewing a high Nile during the reign of Merenptah in a month when, unless Sothic dating is correct, the Nile should not be in flood - hence Sothic dating is correct, Dyn. 18 must have started c.1539BC and Shoshenk must be Shishak. QED - all significant chronology revisions are rubbish. Kitchen apparently calls this evidence his atom bomb' to demolish any attempt at revising ancient history. Rohl gave the ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 11  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/review/v1998n1/49soc.htm
153. Metallurgy and Chronology [Journals] [SIS Review]
... Europe and Western Asia have been developed, surely this is the most honest approach to the problem. Dayton, much to his credit, sees no good reason to tamper with and "correct" the "low" results from Egyptian samples, since they are only "low" when compared to the historical dates derived from the theory of Sothic dating, which he also wisely rejects (p . 190). His map showing the uncorrected dates for the earliest occurrences of copper and tin bronzes in archaeological contexts stresses the obvious fact, obscured by Renfrew's enthusiasm for the "second radiocarbon revolution", that the dates for the metal-working Neolithic cultures of Europe are still earlier than those ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 11  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/review/v0304/081pass.htm
154. Chapter 5 Pottery Dating, Faience, and Tin [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... assign the time of the Second Intermediate Period to any time, and revisionists do not have to adjust their revised historical chronologies so as to comply with that chronology which is so ridden with error. Based on this data this author will maintain that the pottery Petrie found at Abydos is from the first millennium B.C . Rose's work on Sothic dating lends itself to this analysis. Dayton holds to the established chronology somewhat more than the present revisionists this author supports. The vision that pottery dating can be employed without the immense corrections indicated by Dayton's work disqualifies it (in its present form) as a methodology for arguing against the revisionist work of Heinsohn, Rose, and Sweeney ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 11  -  27 May 2007  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/velikov/vol0601/05pottery.pdf
155. The Albrecht/Glueck-Aharoni/Rothenberg Confrontation [Journals] [Catastrophism & Ancient History]
... severe alteration in Egypt's chronology will certainly reduce to a shambles the vast number of known inter-relationships among the peoples of antiquity requires reconsideration. These inter-relations are already in confusion. It is sinmply that the situation has been clouded by elimination of scriptural difficulties, those that provide the largest amount of information- and often the only available source. The sothic dating method on which traditional dates depend rests on premises that have never been established. Velikovsky rejected the method as invalid, as does the present writer. The assignment of years for dynasty XII by this method assumed that events for that dynasty had already been provided approximate dates. Since the astronomical data used repeat themselves periodically, only those ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 11  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/cat-anc/proc1/01glueck.htm
156. Calendars [Journals] [Kronos]
... quadrennium or else on the last year of the terminal quadrennium of the old cycle. 68. Censorinus relates the heliacal rising of Sirius to the Egyptian calendar, a relationship that he thought would repeat itself every 1460 years; he is not concerned with the Alexandrian calendar when he talks about + 139. 69. Censorinus should have had his Sothic period extend 1456 years from -1320 to + 136, in order to reflect the retrocalculated "facts", but he assumes that the Sirius year and the Julian year are equal. 70. The Julian and Gregorian calendars coincide exactly from March 1, + 200, to February 28, + 300. Before and after that century they ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 10  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/kronos/vol0604/028calen.htm
157. Chapter 4 Scientific ? Radiocarbon Dating [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... Near Eastern history is built into their system, those of us who are proponents of the highly shortened chronology have nothing to fear from radiocarbon dating. Rather, all these facts tend to support the highly shortened chronology and tend to contradict the established chronology. In this instance, it is not remiss here to suggest that not only does astronomical Sothic dating undoubtedly support the lower chronology, but in tandem with radiocarbon we arrive at further support for Heinsohn's, Rose's, Sweeney's, as well as Velikovsky's lowered chronologies. Both scientific phenomena cast extreme doubt on the history that has been so long taken as fact. Again, as with scientific Sothic astronomical dating, scientific radiocarbon dating makes greater ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 10  -  27 May 2007  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/velikov/vol0601/04scientific.pdf
158. The Nature of the Historical Record [Journals] [SIS Review]
... but, as DR MACKIE will demonstrate, the results from radiocarbon tests are often inconclusive and mutually contradictory; and even where they are not, their margin of error is too great to be of much value in settling the argument between the conventional and revised chronologies. As regards astronomical dating, even if one accepts that the concept of a Sothic cycle is sound and that it was actually used by the ancient Egyptians (which is open to considerable doubt), the data from which the absolute dates of Senwosret III, Amenhotep I and Thutmose III are derived are so meagre and ambiguous that it would be imprudent to place much, if any, reliance on them [20] ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 10  -  05 Mar 2003  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/review/v0601to3/12natur.htm
... , even more commonly, as Sothi and Sothis, its popular Graeco-Egyptian name, the Brightly Radiating One, the Fair Star of the Waters; but in the vernacular was Sept, Sepet, Sopet, and Sopdit; Sed,54 and Sot, the Ifio of Vettius Valens. Upon this star was laid the foundation of the Canicular, Sothic, or Sothiac Period named after it, which has excited the attention and puzzled the minds of historians, antiquarians, and chronologists. Lockyer has an admirable discussion of this in his Dawn of Astronomy. Sir Edwin Arnold writes of it in his Egyptian Princess: And even when the Star of Kneph has brought the summer round, And ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 9  -  19 Jun 2005  -  URL: /online/pubs/books/stars/index.htm
160. Chapter 2 The Sphinx [Journals] [Velikovskian]
... to overturn Egyptian chronology?" The answer, of course, is "no", but if there are several other scientific forms of evidence that converge on the thesis that the established chronology is invalid, then that evidence should be sufficient to overturn the established chronology. Therefore, let us now turn to the foundation of astronomy, or Sothic dating, upon which Egyptologists have established their chronology. As we will see, Sothic dating is even more damaging to their chronology than the erosion of the Sphinx. ...
Terms matched: 1  -  Score: 8  -  27 May 2007  -  URL: /online/pubs/journals/velikov/vol0601/02sphinx.pdf
Result Pages: << Previous 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next >>

Search powered by Zoom Search Engine



Search took 0.039 seconds