| Man, Myth & Mayhem in Ancient History and the Sciences |
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism
|
Catastrophism.com
history linguistics mythology palaeontology physics psychology religion Uniformitarianism |
|
| Sign-up | Log-in |
Introduction | Publications | More
|
Search results for: rohl in all categories
294 results found.
30 pages of results. 21. Forum [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... High-priests of Amun (at Thebes) under Dynasties 22 and 23. Essentially David's answer conveys the idea of two lines of HPA - one predominately titular and tied to the Libyan royal line, whilst on the other hand an administrative line related to the 21st Dynasty functioned at Thebes. However, my Question was posed because it appeared that the Rohl/James revision was likely to end up with two lines of HPA at Thebes at one and the same time. David's answer does nothing to allay that suspicion, since he does not specify his requirements with regard to the placement of the 21st Dynasty Priestly line, which can hardly have still been functioning at Thebes during a period when ...
22. Dating the Amarna Letters [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... From: SIS Chronology and Catastrophism Workshop 1989 No 1 (May 1989) Home | Issue Contents FORUM Dating the Amarna Letters Derek Shelley-Pearce comments: The El Amarna Letters and the New Chronology' by David Rohl and Bernard Newgrosh (C & C Review X [1988], pp. 23-42) is an extremely readable and well presented article. The work is inspired by its authors' belief that Velikovsky's Ages in Chaos dating is wrong by about 200 years and that his equation of Shishak and Thutmose III together with his el-Amarna identifications are also incorrect by reason of the same erroneous chronological yardstick. Rohl and Newgrosh prefer to move the 18th Dynasty some 200 years earlier in time ...
23. The Dark Age Gap: An Open Letter to John Bimson, Peter James and David Rohl [Journals] [SIS Review]
... From: C&C Review 2004:3 (Incorporating C&C Workshop 2004:4 ) Home | Issue Home The Dark Age Gap: An Open Letter to John Bimson, Peter James and David Rohl from Emmet Sweeney In the early 1980's, a number of British scholars of the Velikovskian movement broke with Velikovsky's proposed reconstruction of history as presented in the Ages in Chaos series. Most prominent among these were Peter James and John Bimson. [See editorial note]. Velikovsky had suggested reducing the age of the Egyptian 18th Dynasty by a full five centuries, bringing the great pharaohs of that time down into the first millennium, where they were shown to interact with ...
24. S.I.S Review Vol. VIII, 1986: Contents [Journals] [SIS Review]
... From: S.I .S Review Vol. VIII, 1986 Texts Home | SIS Review Home Vol. VIII, 1986 S.I .S . Review Journal of the Society for Interdisciplinary Studies Special Tenth Anniversary Tour Issue Contents Brian Moore: Preface i David Rohl: The SIS Tenth Anniversary Tour of Egypt- Report 2 Dr John Bimson: Hatshepsut and the Queen of Sheba : 12 A Critique of Velikovsky's Identification and an Alternative View. Photos: SIS Tenth Anniversary Tour 27, 57 Michael Jones: Shoshenq I and the Traditions of New Kingdom Kingship in Egypt 31 David Rohl: The Bubastite Portal : 34 Evidence Against Velikovsky's Placement of Ramesses II in the Late 7th ...
25. Society News [Journals] [SIS Review]
... . Report on SIS Study Group 24th Feb. 1996 Present were Benny Peiser, Bob Porter, David Roth, Emmet Sweeney, Geoff Bennett, Margaret Grant Trevor Palmer. The main subject was David Rohl's book A Test of Time but there were several digressions. Tony Chavasse could not come but he sent a note. I agree with David Rohl that Chaneferres was probably the same as Kha-nefer-re, brother of Nefer-hotep, and placed in the Turin Papyrus 6.25, of the 13th dynasty. Sir Alan Gardiner also noted this correspondence but he did not pursue it as not consistent with his dating of the 13th dynasty kings and his dating of the Exodus. David Rohl's dating of ...
26. Summary and Closing Address [Journals] [SIS Review]
... and came to the conclusion that many El-Amarna correspondents were unknown to history, they were not alter egos of famous people. He mentioned extensively the work of F.J . Giles and the detailed analysis of both the small and the larger aspects of the Amarna Letters and used that evidence to argue that the interpretations of both Velikovsky and David Rohl cannot be correct. In the case of David Rohl, that the Labayu of the El Amarna Letters could not have been Saul and in Velikovsky's case could not have been Ahab and similarly for example when Velikovsky identified Shalmaneser III as being one of the correspondents, it was clearly a female that was being referred to, which was quite ...
27. C&C Review 1988 Issue (Volume X): Contents [Journals] [SIS Review]
... his series of articles examining the evidence for a major disruption at or around 2300 BC, Moe Mandelkehr has amassed a wealth of geological data in support of his thesis. His impressive catalogue of data constitutes a challenge both to uniformitarians (who have to explain the disruptions) and to catastrophists (who have to indicate their source). David Rohl & Bernard Newgrosh: The El Amarna Letters and the New Chronology 23 A successful revised chronology for the ancient Near East must take into account the evidence of the El Amarna Letters. This paper re-examines their witness and compares it to the best source on Palestine - the Old Testament - finding dramatic parallels in the Early Monarchy period. Thus ...
28. The Followers of Horus: Eastern Desert Survey Report. Vol 1, by David Rohl (Review) [Journals] [SIS Review]
... From: SIS Chronology & Catastrophism Review 2001:1 (Apr 2001) Home | Issue Contents The Followers of Horus: Eastern Desert Survey Report. Vol 1 Edited by David Rohl (Institute of Interdisciplinary Sciences, 2000, 200 pages. Available from Mike Rowland, ISIS Treasurer, 127 Porter Road, Basingstoke, Hants. RG22 4JT.) Reviewed by Steve Mitchell Rohl's central thesis is that the Nile Valley was colonised by invaders from Mesopotamia during pre-Dynastic Nakada II. They arrived in high-prowed boats decorated with the emblem of Horus, the falcon, and navigated the waterways of what are now the dry wadis of the Eastern Desert of Egypt. They were after gold for their ...
29. Ages Still In Chaos: Defending The Indefensible [Journals] [SIS Review]
... . Does it not bring into view a whole new perspective that should give them cause to stop and reassess? What of my own offerings on the Assyrian history that is inextricably linked with Biblical history, a history that Thiele had to manipulate against the very evidence he was attempting to prove? What of the cogent arguments put forward by David Rohl and John Bimson that Shoshenq couldn't be Shishak? If we expect academia to respect our claims, can we critically apply these Conference themes in defence of the work of Immanuel Velikovsky, particularly his Ages in Chaos, and the newest revision, David Rohl's New Chronology' [2 ]? The Glasgow Chronology' argued that Ages in Chaos ...
30. New Chronology Issues [Journals] [SIS Workshop]
... the placements for the 20th Dynasty Ramessides. In Workshop 1989:1 , p. 24 I queried the reductions involved in the various dynasties pointing out that whilst there were reductions of 220 years from the Cambridge Ancient History dates for the 20th Dynasty, there was a much larger reduction for Dynasty 19 of about 312 years. In answer David Rohl stated it might be advisable to apply the same method to the 19th and 20th Dynasties as was employed in constructing the revised model for the 21st to 25th Dynasties. ' I again queried this in Workshop 1989:2 , pp. 9-11. Rohl answered we do not dispute the contemporaneity of Herihor and Ramesses XI but instead propose that ...
Search powered by Zoom Search Engine Search took 0.040 seconds |
